Consumer ServicesMid capRs 7,103 crRs 15.5 cr traded a day
Close on 10 September 2026
161.92
−3.35%
52-week range6% of the way up
151.68335.55
Market cap
7,103 cr
P/E (TTM)
81.9×
industry 44×
EPS (TTM)
1.98
Revenue YoY
+13.4%
Q1 FY27
Profit YoY
+80.8%
Net margin
9.6%
+3.6pt vs a year ago
Growth trend
+5.0pt
vs last quarter’s YoY
1 month
-9.2%
Below 52w high
107.2%
RSI (14)
39
Daily swing
3.6%
average true range
Volume
1.7×
vs 20-day average
Traded
Rs 16 cr
median day
Close200-day averageMaterial filing
260 sessions · hover for the filing behind a move
Key metrics
each ranked against every stock scanned tonight
Above the 200-day average
Bottom of the universe
-15.3%
One-year return
Bottom of the universe
-41.8%
Return on capital employed
n/a
Debt to equity
n/a
Profitable quarters, last four
of the last four reported
3 of 4
Cash conversion
cash from operations against reported profit
n/a
Revenue growth, year on year
latest reported quarter
+13.4%
Below the 52-week high
from the highest close of the year
-51.7%
1 week
−0.14%
1 month
−9.22%
3 months
−11.44%
6 months
−3.06%
1 year
−41.79%
The read
written from the numbers on this page
The evidence is mixed5 supporting, 4 against, 0 worth knowing
Supporting
matches falling on heavy volume, which has beaten the market by +1.45 points over 20 sessions across 11,619 past signals
5 of the scans it matches have a positive measured record
3 independent kinds of evidence agree today, which is uncommon
revenue grew 13% year on year in the quarter ending 30 June 2026
net margin has widened from -1.2% to 9.6% across four quarters
Against
trading 15% below its 200-day average
at 6% of its 52-week range — nearly everyone who bought in the past year is underwater
down 42% over twelve months
priced at 82× earnings against an industry median of 44× — 86% above its peers
Worth knowing
nothing the data supports either way
What would change this read: a close back above 191, its 200-day average.
Assembled automatically from the figures on this page — the scans matched, their measured record, the filed financials, the derivatives positioning and the peer comparison. It is not a recommendation, no one has spoken to the company, and every claim above can be checked against a number further down this page.
What is working, what is not
from the filings and from the price, with the figure behind every line
Working3
Net profit rose 80.8% year on year, from Rs 19 cr to Rs 34 cr.
+80.8%Rs 19 crRs 34 cr
Profit grew faster than revenue, +80.8% against +13.4%.
+80.8%+13.4%
Net margin improved from 6.0% to 9.6% in the same quarter last year.
6.0%9.6%
Needs watching5
Trading 15.3% below its 200-day average.
-15.3%
52% below its 52-week high.
-52%
Only 6.8% above its 52-week low.
+6.8%
Down 41.8% over the past year.
-41.8%
A warning rule fires on it tonight: falling on heavy volume.
Falling on heavy volume
Every figure here is computed — from the company’s own filings, or from its own closing prices. Wording of 3 of these 3 filing lines was drafted by a language model, which is given the figures and may not introduce another — any sentence containing a number that did not come from the filings is discarded before it reaches this page.
How it has performed
price return over each window, beside the median NSE stock over the same days
What the scans say today
5 of 47 matched on 10 Sep
IXIGO matches 5 of the 47 scans today, across 3 different kinds of evidence. Three or more independent families agreeing is uncommon — it is the same test the shortlist on every page uses.
IXIGO trades at 82× trailing earnings, below its median of 131× over this window — 38% less expensive than usual. The band runs from the 5th to the 95th percentile, so single-day spikes do not set the edges.
This window is short by the standards of valuation history — it begins where four quarters of filed earnings first exist. A stock can look cheap against two years and expensive against ten.
AGM / EGM filings were typically +0.17pt vs the market over the next 5 sessions (n=8,423) · M&A filings were typically +0.18pt vs the market over the next 5 sessions (n=1,722) · Results filings were typically -0.51pt vs the market over the next 5 sessions (n=7,726)
The business
from the company’s filed results
Everything below is taken from the company’s own quarterly filing with the exchange — the XBRL document it submitted, not a vendor’s summary of it. Figures in rupees crore.
RevenueNet profit, drawn inside its revenue barNet margin, own scale belowrupees crore, per quarter as filed. Revenue bars start at zero.
Going for it
revenue grew 13% against the same quarter a year earlier
profit rose 81% year on year
Going against it
net margin narrowed from 10.4% to 9.6%
Quarter-by-quarter numbers, as filed
Quarter
Revenue
Profit before tax
Net profit
EPS
Net margin
Q1 FY27
30 Jun · consolidated
357
48
34
0.73
9.6%
Q4 FY26
31 Mar · consolidated
308
38
32
0.72
10.4%
Q3 FY26
31 Dec · consolidated
318
35
24
0.58
7.5%
Q2 FY26
30 Sep · consolidated
283
-2
-3
—
-1.2%
Q1 FY26
30 Jun · consolidated
314
29
19
0.49
6.0%
Q4 FY25
31 Mar · consolidated
284
27
17
0.43
5.9%
Quarterly filings are unaudited unless stated. Consolidated figures are used where the company files both. A single quarter is a noisy thing — the trend across the column is worth more than the top row.
Where the price stands
the same figures every scan on this site is computed from
Trend
Distance from the averages traders watch. Above all of them is a bull phase; below the 200-day is the line most investors use to say otherwise.
Versus 50-day average-12.4%
Versus 200-day average-15.3%
Below 52-week high-51.7%
Above 52-week low+6.8%
Momentum
How hard it has been pushed lately. Above 70 on RSI is stretched, below 30 is washed out — neither is a signal on its own.
RSI (14)38.9
Higher closes in last 53 of 5
Six-month return−3.06%
Risk and liquidity
What a position costs to hold and to exit. Position sizing starts with the daily swing, not with conviction.
Typical daily swing (ATR)3.62%
Volume versus 20-day1.7x
Median daily turnoverRs 15.5 cr
Peers
Consumer Services · 45 classified companies
IXIGO trades at 81.9× trailing earnings against an industry median of 44.1× across 35 other classified companies in its industry — more expensive than them, by 86%. A multiple is a statement about expectations, not about quality: cheap usually means the market expects less, and it is often right.